Siteground vs A2 hosting :
SiteGround was one of the most successful hosts, and is particularly impressive considering the $ 3.95 price for their StartUp hosting offer. It is true that it has a limitation of a single website for this price, but given the response time which was on average about 700ms even 50 simultaneous users without real hitch, SiteGround offers a big value .
Location of the Test Server: Dallas, TX
Location of the SiteGround server: Chicago, IL
Max response time: 1.79 seconds
Minimum response time: 669.9 milliseconds
Arvixe has been in the web hosting industry for pretty some time supplying his services to different open supply communities like Joomla and Drupal, and feature just started out transferring their efforts to the WordPress area over the last yr.Their results here are respectable. They are not breathtaking, but they remain solid all the way down to User 50. They had a small hitch, but it recovered very quickly and the server finished the test in heroic mode.
Test Server Location: Palo Alto, CA
Place Server Arvixe: Santa Rosa, CA
Max response time: 2.93 seconds
Average response time: 1,06 seconds
A2 Hosting publishes quite ambitious claims on its internet site, claiming 300% faster loading times with WordPress. A2 is doing nicely overall, but is truly no longer 300% faster than the opposition Many of the hosts listed here, who do not even claim to be hosting WordPress hosts, have achieved better results. The minimum charge time of 455ms is without a doubt impressive, and it was only slightly higher at the end of the test. Overall, they post a solid performance.
Location of the Test Server: Ashburn, VA
Location of Server A2: Ann Arbor, MI
Max response time: 1.12 seconds
Minimum response time: 455.17ms
Winner : siteground